Effective Math Lessons

A Blog on Elementary Math Education by Monica Yuskaitis
  • Home
  • Products
  • Math Links
  • Freebies
  • Anchor Charts
  • About Us
  • Testimonials

Direct Instruction of Mathematics Vs. Computer Based Mathematics Instruction

on May 30, 2018 by Monica Yuskaitis in Uncategorized

If I were to ask you which teaching strategy works better for mathematics in the classroom, direct instruction (teaching), or computer base instruction what would you say?  That is such an important question today because school districts are dumping millions of dollars into computer based instruction in mathematics and other areas of the curriculum.  So I decided to do a little research of my own on ERIC.  To my surprise the first article I read was about a study done in a middle school in Minnesota.  They were using ALEKS (Assessment and Learning in Knowledge Spaces), a technology-based mathematics curriculum and was piloted in the 2012-2013 school year.  Two groups were compared:  regular classrooms where direct instruction was the mode of delivery of the math lessons, and classrooms where the delivery of math instruction was through the computer based ALEKS program.  The comparison of test scores on the Minnesota Comprehensive Assessment (MCA-III) was made at the end of the year and an additional district developed test based on mathematical concepts.  Surprisingly, the findings showed grades six and eight student achievement was significantly higher from the direct instruction group when comparing test results on the district developed concept tests.  On the other hand, seventh grade students in the direct instruction group achievement was significantly higher on the official MCA-III.   So it turned out to be a mixed bag.

So I went to another study “Unpacking TPACK in Mathematics Education Research: A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses” published in 2016 by Jamaal Young.  He examined 65 initial studies that compared computer based technology in mathematics education.  He narrowed it down to 13 that met the criteria he needed to do the study and found that of the mean effect size (growth) in mathematical achievement was from small to medium.

So in summary, computer based technology is definitely having a positive effect in mathematics instruction, but the significance is not huge at this point.  We need to consider that there are many programs out there at this point and some are better than others.  If we want to see these programs improve, we would be wise to give feedback to the companies that make them and suggest improvements as we see them.  We also learned that direct instruction is still very powerful in teaching mathematic concepts and we should not altogether abandon that approach.  Personally, I see the need for both.  Some concepts will be better taught and reviewed with computers, and other topics with direct instruction.  You be the judge!

If you would like to see math lessons built on the 13 principles of effective math research click here:  Effective Math Lessons Store

Sources:

Mertes, Emily Sue, “A Mathematics Education Comparative Analysis of ALEKS Technology and Direct Classroom Instruction”, ProQuest LLC, Ed.D. Dissertation, Bethel University

https://eric.ed.gov/?q=online+mathematics&ff1=eduElementary+Education&ff2=pubDissertations%2fTheses+-+Doctoral+Dissertations&id=ED556586

Young, Jamaal Rashad, “Unpacking TPACK in Mathematics Education Research: A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses”, International Journal of Educational Methodology, v2 n1 p19-29 2016

« Do You Ever Wonder How Your Math Series Compares?
Wait! Don’t Take Out Music too! »

Leave a comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Archives

  • October 2019
  • May 2018
  • November 2017
  • August 2017
  • April 2017
  • January 2017
  • October 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2015
  • April 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • November 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
Find effective math research in the following lessons:

Statistics 1

Statistics 1

Covers Common Core 6th grade standard 6.SP1

Statistics 2

Statistics 2

Covers Common Core 6th grade standards 6.SP1, 6.SP2, 6.SP3, 6.SP5c

Statistics 3

Statistics 3

Covers Common Core 6th grade standard 6.SP2, 6.SP5a,b,c,d

Statistics 4

Statistics 4

Covers Common Core 6th grade standards 6.SP2, 6.SP4, 6.SP5a,b,c,d

Statistics 5

Statistics 5

Covers Common Core 6th grade standards 6.SP2, 6.SP3, 6.SP4, 6.SP5a,b,c,d

Statistics 6

Statistics 6

Covers Common Core 6th grade standards 6.NS6a, 6.NS7c, 6.SP3, 6.SP5a,b,c,d

© 2015 Monica Yuskaitis